Great question, jpickle. Don’t know, practiced only on the civil side.
Adam, you are a fantastic interviewer because you listen. A rare quality for journalists these days who too often are thinking about their next question rather than listen and respond to the answer. Bravo, young man. We love your interview prowess.
Great question. In other words, does the prohibition against double jeopardy apply to prevent the government’s appeal? I don’t know, I just practiced civil law for nearly 50 years. Halligan was a fool to think she could handle a criminal case from inception (indictment) through trial when she previously practiced on the civil side only. That was a fool's errand.
Holy guacamole, you can't make this stuff up!
Thank you for these explainers.
Love Mr. Epner! How can one bring so much quick wit and humor to such deep legal ease?! Beautiful!
Excellent analysis. I’d be fascinated to hear from a legal ethicist on this case and the larger context of retribution and weaponization of law.
Thanks for this in depth analysis. I am disappointed in traditional media… this should be front page, top level news, yet it is barely mentioned...
This was awesome.... Thank you Mr Epner as well
Aloha. From the COCONUT WIRELESS. .......................................
if the prosecution is dismissed with prejudice, can DOJ appeal?
Great question, jpickle. Don’t know, practiced only on the civil side.
Adam, you are a fantastic interviewer because you listen. A rare quality for journalists these days who too often are thinking about their next question rather than listen and respond to the answer. Bravo, young man. We love your interview prowess.
Great question. In other words, does the prohibition against double jeopardy apply to prevent the government’s appeal? I don’t know, I just practiced civil law for nearly 50 years. Halligan was a fool to think she could handle a criminal case from inception (indictment) through trial when she previously practiced on the civil side only. That was a fool's errand.