“Defendants are not required to withdraw the 300 National Guard troops currently stationed in Los Angeles, nor are they barred from using troops consistent with the Posse Comitatus Act.” I don’t get it. Are the 300 in LA being used consistent with the Act? Because they’re sitting around playing tiddlywinks, or what? Please explain.
Also explain why Breyer shied away from saying his ruling applies throughout the country? Is he capitulating to the regime saying district court judges’ opinions only apply to their district? If so, why? I thought a district judge ruling - absence any other precedent - applies everywhere until an appellate court reverses or someone litigates in a different district and gets a contrary ruling? Please explain!
.
“Defendants are not required to withdraw the 300 National Guard troops currently stationed in Los Angeles, nor are they barred from using troops consistent with the Posse Comitatus Act.” I don’t get it. Are the 300 in LA being used consistent with the Act? Because they’re sitting around playing tiddlywinks, or what? Please explain.
Also explain why Breyer shied away from saying his ruling applies throughout the country? Is he capitulating to the regime saying district court judges’ opinions only apply to their district? If so, why? I thought a district judge ruling - absence any other precedent - applies everywhere until an appellate court reverses or someone litigates in a different district and gets a contrary ruling? Please explain!
FIGHT BACK! If YOU Live in a Blue State, follow this link and Contact Your Governor!
https://open.substack.com/pub/jodygorran/p/if-you-live-in-a-blue-state-contact?r=68rn&utm_medium=ios