8 Comments
User's avatar
Gina Parrinello's avatar

Our courts, with the exception of the Supreme Court, seem to be holding the line on democracy! Thanks for you succinct reporting Adam!

Deborah solleveld's avatar

Excellent news thank you!

SLMontgo's avatar

Will this give former-Judge Hannah Dugan another chance for vindication? She has been obviously railroaded by MAGA-sympathizers. This must be pursued in light of this latest ruling.

Adam Klasfeld's avatar

I just added a correction to this story. Although the voided policies referred to arrests "in or near courthouses," the policies challenged by this lawsuit specifically referred to immigration courthouses, not state or local ones. I'm continuing to research the implications of the ruling.

SLMontgo's avatar

Ahh. Thank you, Adam, for this additional clarification. Also, I look forward to learning about your futher research.

Sassi's avatar

I would hope this ruling could positively impact Hannah Dugan's situation. Ice... Trump... +++ have been going WAY TOO FAR! Thank heavens for rulings that constrain them.

Jill Crary's avatar

There are few people in Gov't that I respect since 🎺came into office; but these Judges are 3 of them. 💓

Patricia Ebert's avatar

Thanks for covering this important ruling, Adam. I do hope it can also have an impact on the unfair rulings Hannah Dugan has had to endure.