11 Comments
User's avatar
Unmute Alabama's avatar

Interesting position from the judge. You are so utterly unqualified that I am not referring you to your bar for disciplinary action.

Ellen Proctor's avatar

I love your second sentence. It sounds so ominous! Perhaps a small, dark jail cell?

Simply Susan's avatar

Many thanks to Judge Novak for his sizzlingly clear message to Blanche, Bondi and Halligan.

Now I'll be humming the theme song from "Charade" all afternoon.

Phyllis Hedges's avatar

Good post. Thank you Adam. And KUDOS to Judge Novak!

Colleen Cummins's avatar

Judge Novak, a tour de force!

With this line, "Ms. Halligan and anyone who joins her on a pleading containing the improper moniker subjects themselves to potential disciplinary action in this Court pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules," a gauntlet is thrown down leaving Halligan not standing alone but in good company between the two leads of the DOJ, Bondi and Blanche. Would love to see that "disciplinary action" taken against Bondi and Blanche.

spenlo's avatar

Just another example of Trump's planned chaos. He probably has expectations of taking this matter to the Supremes for their rubber stamp under their unitary executive theory. When I say "he," I don't really mean Trump. He wouldn't understand this. I mean the minions that are operating the puppet DJT, you know, the little wizards behind the screen.

Sarah Marshall's avatar

I love this for her.

Denise Wallace's avatar

Very interesting. Who would apply ? It will be exciting to see who fills the vacancy.

Mary Kay Benson's avatar

When federal judges stop short of enforcing the law...?

Maggie Helveston's avatar

OK. But what is the Chief Judge of the Eaastern District trying to do? She seems to be inventing some kind of doctrine that allows for serial interim attorneys, like a new one every 120 days. That’s some weird sh uh stuff.

menehune's avatar

ALOHA.. On the ONE FINGER COCONUT WIRELESS. ...................................................................................